- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46932 WP No. 32717 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 32717 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: NAGESH. T S/O LATE THAMMAIAH @ THIMMARAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O RAMASAGAR VILLAGE, MADAMARANAHALLI POST, HAROHALLI TALUK, RAMANAGARAM DISTRICT-562 112. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHIVARAJU M K.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, KEMPE GOWDA ROAD, BENGALURU-560 009. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU SOUTH SUB DIVISION, KANDAYA BHAVAN, KEMPEGOWDA ROAD, Digitally signed by SUMA B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46932 WP No. 32717 of 2025 BENGALURU-560 009. 4. THE TAHSILDAR AND MEMBER SECRETARY UNAUTHORIZED SAGUVALI COMMITTEE, ANEKAL TALUK, ANEKAL BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT -562 106 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKHAR, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ENDORSEMENT DATED 25.09.2025 UNDER ANNEXURE-A PASSED IN CASE NO. LND.CR.187/2021-22 BY THE FOURTH RESPONDENT DULY REJECTING THE CLAIM OF THE PETITIONER PRAYING FOR REGULARIZATION OF HIS UNAUTHORIZATION CULTIVATION OF THE LAND BEARING SY. NO. 26 MEASURING 2 ACRES SITUATED AT J. BINGIPURA VILLAGE, JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, IN HIS FAVOUR AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46932 WP No. 32717 of 2025 ORAL ORDER The present petition has been filed seeking for setting aside of the Endorsement at Annexure-A dated 25.09.2025 passed by the respondent No.4 rejecting the claim of the petitioner for regularization. 2. Annexure-A was only an endorsement, learned AGA has filed proceedings of the Committee for Regularization of Unauthorised Occupation, in which claim of the petitioner has been specifically rejected. 3. In light of the same, petition is disposed of as not calling for adjudication while relegating the petitioner to challenge the Order of the Regularization Committee before the appropriate forum in accordance with law. 4. All contentions are kept open. 5. The possession of the petitioner to be protected for a period of three weeks. Petitioner to take appropriate steps to challenge the proceedings, if so, advised. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE RL/- List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34