Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:38071] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3282/2001 Sn Popcorn Private Limited through its Director Vinay Chordia S/o Shri Labh Chand Chordia, 61 Sangram Colony, Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State of Rajasthan through its Secretary, Urban Development & Housing Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur
2. Jaipur Development Authority its Secretary Jaipur.
3. Tehsildar ZoneB, Jaipur Development, Jaipur ----Non-petitioners For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Praveen Balwada, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ishan Kumawat, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 17/09/2025 Vide order dated 11.07.2001, demolition action qua the property in question was stayed until further orders.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the action, as disclosed in the petition, was taken under Section 32 of JDA Act, 1982 and other provisions of the Act and it is amenable to an alternate efficacious remedy before the JDA Tribunal, as questions of fact are involved, including issues related to permission, title, and the necessity of demolition, for which the Tribunal is competent to adjudicate. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the present petition with liberty to the petitioner to prefer an appeal before the JDA Tribunal
[2025:RJ-JP:38071] (2 of 2) [CW-3282/2001] within a period of 15 days from the date of passing of this order and JDA Tribunal is directed to decide on interim relief promptly and render a final decision within a period of 60 days, thereafter. Until the interim order is passed on merits, the interim protection as directed vide order dated 11.07.2001 shall remain effective. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of with the aforementioned liberty and directions being granted. Any pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. No prejudice will be caused to either side of the parties while
consideration of the present matter on its merits by the appropriate authority.
(SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /21