RAVI S/O NAGSHETTY NAUBADE v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
CRL.A/200135/2025 · 2025-06-04
K S Hemalekha, Mohammad Nawaz
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8718 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8718 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:2822-DB CRL.A No. 200135 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ AND THE HON'BLE Mrs JUSTICE K S HEMALEKHA
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 200135 OF 2025 BETWEEN:
RAVI S/O NAGSHETTY NAUBADE AGE : 44 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE AND CABLE OPERATOR, R/O MASIMAD NOW AT RAJGERA TQ. AND DIST. BIDAR. …APPELLANT
(BY SRI. MANURE ASHOK KUMAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI -585104. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SIDDALING P. PATIL, ADD.SPP)
THIS CRL. APPEAL IS FILED U/S 413 OF BNSS (U/S 372 (2) OF CR.P.C.), PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS, SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF CONVICTION RECORDED AGAINST THE ACCUSED/APPELLANT IN S.C.NO.157/2023 PASSED BY THE PRL. DIST. AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT BIDAR ON DATED 29.11.2024 FOR THE OFFENCE FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 302 OF IPC AND THEREBY SET THE APPELLANTS AT LIBERTY HOLDING THAT THE PROSECUTION
Digitally signed by BASALINGAPPA SHIVARAJ DHUTTARGAON Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:2822-DB CRL.A No. 200135 of 2025
HAS NOT PROVED THE GUILT OF THE APPELLANTS AND ACQUIT THE APPELLANTS IN THE CASE.
THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ AND HON'BLE Mrs JUSTICE K S HEMALEKHA
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ)
This appeal is preferred against the judgment and order dated 29.11.2024 passed by the Court of Principal District and Sessions Judge at Bidar in Sessions Case No.157/2013.
2. Office has raised an objection regarding maintainability of the appeal, since the appellant has already preferred Crl.A No.200331/2024 against the very same impugned judgment.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the appellant is not present.
4. Since an appeal is already preferred against the impugned judgment and the same is pending consideration, the present appeal is not maintainable.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:2822-DB CRL.A No. 200135 of 2025
5. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as not maintainable, reserving liberty to the appellant to pursue Crl.A No.200331/2024.
Sd/- (MOHAMMAD NAWAZ) JUDGE
Sd/- (K S HEMALEKHA) JUDGE
THM/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10