Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8717 (UTT)

RAJVEER ALIAS RAJVEER SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

C528/1052/2025 · 2025-07-08

Ashish Naithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:5871 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS (Compounding Appl. No.01 of 2025) In C528 No.1052 of 2025 Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. Bilal Ahmed, learned counsel for the Applicant. 2. Mr. Akshay Latwal, learned AGA assisted by Mr. Prabhat Kandpal, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Mr. A.K. Beniwal, learned counsel for respondent nos.2 & 3. 4. Present application has been filed by the Applicant under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. alongwith compounding application and the same is supported with the affidavits of Applicant and Respondent nos.2 & 3. 5. Applicant as well as respondent nos.2 & 3 are present through V.C. They are duly identified by their respective counsel. 6. By means of this C528 application, Applicant has sought quashing of the charge sheet dated 20.05.2024 (Annexure no.2), summoning order dated 27.05.2025 and the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.93 of 2025 (Case Crime No.70 of 2024) State vs. Rajveer Singh for the offence punishable under Sections 452, 323, 504 and 354 of IPC, registered at P.S. Jhabrera, District Haridwar pending in the court of 2nd ACJ(JD)/JM(R), Roorkee, District Haridwar. 7. Learned counsel for the parties have filed their respective affidavits along with the compounding application stating therein that they do not wish to pursue the present criminal case any further and a compromise has been entered between them. 8. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 2025:UHC:5871 9. In view of the principle of law laid down by Ho’ble the Apex Court in the case of Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab reported in 2012 (10) SCC 303, criminal proceedings can be quashed by this Court, if this Court is satisfied that matter has been settled between the parties amicably and parties are interest to restore peace and harmony between them. 10. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in view of the above, the compounding application is allowed. The entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.93 of 2025 (Case Crime No.70 of 2024) State vs. Rajveer Singh for the offence punishable under Sections 452, 323, 504 and 354 of IPC, registered at P.S. Jhabrera, District Haridwar pending in the court of 2nd ACJ(JD)/JM(R), Roorkee, District Haridwar are hereby quashed. 11. Accordingly instant Criminal Misc. Application stands disposed of. (Ashish Naithani, J.) 08.07.2025 Arti ARTI SINGH Digitally signed by ARTI SINGH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=487ed955e722ba65aab55409e686c12fb83a19325e8b66890fbee418e7b69c0d, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=26DC90E00D839E3E8714131F235087D2D87E133C57E7F4A7B2E734BE2521F982, cn=ARTI SINGH Date: 2025.07.10 10:18:05 +05'30'