Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.MP(M) No. 502 of 2025 Date of Decision : 11.03.2025 Amandeep ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. ....Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? No. For the petitioner : Mr. Naveen Kumar Bhardwaj, Advocate. For the respondent/State : Mr. Jitender Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Jitender Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent-State. Copy of FIR has been filed which is taken on record.
2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that he wants to withdraw the present petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 11th March, 2025 (Chander)