IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88745 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-402 Year-2023 Thana- PIPRA District- Supaul ====================================================== Sandeep Kumar @ Guddu Rangila @ Gddu Rangeela Son of Dinesh Yadav Resident of Village - Belokhara, Ward No.- 05, P.S. - Pipra, District - Supaul, State - Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Kuldeep Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Mithlesh Kumar Khare, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 2 08-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No. 402 of 2023, registered for the offences under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. As per the prosecution case, three masked youths riding a Splendor motorcycle overtook the motorcycle of the informant and on gunpoint took away Rs.15,300/-, a smart phone and a keypad phone. The name of the petitioner transpired during investigation as one of the accused persons involved in the crime. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88745 of 2024(2) dt.08-01-2025 2/3 falsely implicated in this case on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Chanchal Kumar Paswan recorded in Raghopur P.S.Case No. 65 of 2024. No looted articles have been recovered from person or possession of this petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 28.06.2024 but no Test Identification Parade has been conducted till date. Except for disclosure made by the co-accused persons there is no material against the petitioner. Charge Sheet has been submitted against the petitioner. Petitioner has been made accused in a number of cases after his name cropped up in the present case. 5. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State opposes the submission made on behalf of the petitioner. Learned A.P.P. submits that the petitioner is having antecedent of similar nature. 6. Having regard to the fact and circumstances and submission made on behalf of the parties and considering the period of custody of the petitioner and submission of charge sheet against him, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Supaul/concerned court, in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No. 402 of 2023, subject to the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88745 of 2024(2) dt.08-01-2025 3/3 condition laid down under Section 437(3) of the code of Criminal Procedure and other following conditions: (i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner. (ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the below, if so required by the learned trial court. (iii) In case of absence on three consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned. anuradha/- (Arun Kumar Jha, J) U T