Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 87159 (KAR)

SRI VASANTH KUMAR K v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/32805/2025 · 2025-11-13

Suraj Govindaraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46208 WP No. 32805 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 32805 OF 2025 (GM-FOR) BETWEEN: 1. SRI VASANTH KUMAR K S/O MONAPPA GOWDA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS R/AT KUJAGODU HOUSE INEKIDU VILLAGE, SUBRAMNYA POST KADABA TALUK- 574238. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SRINIVASA GOWDA B R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF FOREST ENVIRONMENT AND ECOLOGY M S BUILDING, BENGALURU 560001. 2. THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST, FOREST OFFICE (NODAL OFFICER) HEAD FOREST OFFICE ARANYA BHAVAN, 4TH FLOOR MALLESHWARAM 18TH CROSS BENGALURU 560003. 3. THE CENTRAL EMPOWERED COMMITTEE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT, FOREST AND WILD LIFE Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46208 WP No. 32805 of 2025 IIND FLOOR, CHANAKYA BHAVAN CHANAKYAPURI, NEW DELHI 110001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.B RAVINDRANATH, AGA FOR R1 & R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS FROM THE RESPONDENTS NO 2 AND 3, DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS NO 2 AND 3 TO CONSIDER THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER VIDE ANNEXURE-C, DATED- 26.12.2024 AS DEEMS FIT UNDER THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. Learned AGA accepts notice for respondents No.1 and 2. 2. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs; - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46208 WP No. 32805 of 2025 A. Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other writ or order, directing the Respondents No: 2 and 3 to consider the application filed by the Petitioner vide Annexure-C, dated: 26.12.2024 as deems fit under the facts and circumstances of the case in the interest of Justice and Equity. B. Direct the 2nd and 3rd Respondents to expeditiously consider/decide of the Application / representation filed for Renewal of the lease submitted by the Petitioner vide Annexure-C dated: 26.12.2024 in the interest of justice and equity. C. Allow this Writ Petition with cost and pass such other order that this Hon'ble Court deems fit under the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity. 3. The grievance of the petitioner is that the representation of the petitioner submitted to respondents No.2 and 3 on 26.12.2024 at Annexure-C has not been considered. It is in that background, that the petitioner is before this Court seeking for the aforesaid reliefs. 4. Whenever any representation has been submitted by a citizen to any authority, it is required that the said - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46208 WP No. 32805 of 2025 representation be acted upon and necessary orders be passed within a reasonable period of time, either accepting or rejecting the representation submitted, in accordance with law. 5. Needless to say, if an order of rejection is passed, the same would have to be accompanied by reasons. Neither having been done, I pass the following: ORDER i. The writ petition is allowed. ii. A mandamus is issued, directing respondents No.2 and 3 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 26.12.2024 at Annexure-C and pass necessary orders within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE DM LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 11