Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 87132 (KAR)

NAGARAJAGOWDA v. SHARADAMMA

RSA/389/2018 · 2025-10-13

K Manmadha Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40328 RSA No. 389 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 389 OF 2018 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. NAGARAJAGOWDA S/O ERAPPAGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/O BANKAVALLI VILLAGE, JADE HOBLI, SORABA TALUK, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT- 577 419. 2. BASAKKAMMA @ BHARATHI W/O GUDDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O BANKAVALLI VILLAGE, JADE HOBLI, SORABA TALUK, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT- 577 419. 3. BASAVARAJUGOWDA S/O ERAPPAGOWDA, SINCE DEAD BY HIS LEGAL HEIRS 3(A) SHOBHA @ SOUBHAGYA W/O BASAVARAJAGOUDA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, 3(B) SHIVAKUMAR S/O BASAVARAJAGOUDA, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, APPELLNATS 3(A) AND 3(B) ARE RESIDENTS OF KOTIGERI HOLEHONNUR TALUK- 577 227 SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT. Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40328 RSA No. 389 of 2018 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. S V PRAKASH., ADVOCATE) AND: SHARADAMMA W/O VISHWANATHAGOWDA, AGED MAJOR, BASHI VILLAGE, BANAVASI HOBLI, SIRSI TALUK, KARWAR DISTRICT- 581 301 PRESENTLY RESIDENT OF BANKAVALLI VILLAGE, JADE HOBLI, SORABA TALUK- 577 419 SHIVAMOGA DISTRICT. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. PATIL DAYANAND SUBRAYA GOUDA AND SRI. M.RAVINDRANATH, ADVOCATE) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC, 1908 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DTD 06.09.2016 PASSED IN RA.NO.14/2013, ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., SORABA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 15.04.2013 PASSED IN OS.NO.152/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., SORAB. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40328 RSA No. 389 of 2018 ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellants appears and submits that the details of deceased sole respondent are not obtained from any source and sought to dismiss this Regular Second Appeal as abated. 2. In view of the above, this Regular Second Appeal is dismissed as abated for the time being. Sd/- (DR.K.MANMADHA RAO) JUDGE GSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11