CR-5206-2025 -1- 116 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-5206-2025 Date of decision: 09.09.2025 M/S PARKASH INDUSTRIES ...Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S LUVPURE HEARBALS ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI Present:- Mr. Ashwani Rohilla, Advocate and Mr. Sandeep Lather, Advocate for the petitioner. **** JASGURPREET SINGH PURI, J. (Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for directing the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), SAS Nagar, Mohali to decide the execution petition dated 12.06.2021 (Annexure P-1) filed by the petitioner, which is pending from 07.08.2025 before the learned Civil Judge (JD), Mohali. 2. On 05.08.2025, a report was called for from the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), SAS Nagar, Mohali with regard to the status of the pending execution application filed by the petitioner. Today, a report dated 01.09.2025 has been received from the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), SAS Nagar, Mohali. The relevant portion of the aforesaid report is reproduced as under:- “On the subject cited above, I have the honour to submit that in the above mentioned case, Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh, vide order dated CHETAN THAKUR 2025.09.09 17:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CR-5206-2025 -2- 05.08.2025, called a report from the undersigned with regard to the above said execution pending in the court of undersigned. In this regard it his respectfully submitted that the present execution application was transferred to the Court of Ld. CJ(SD), SAS Nagar, as per order dated 18.07.2025 passed by Ld. Additional District Judge, SAS Nagar, and thereafter, the present execution was received by way of entrustment to the court of undersigned on on 25.07.2025 (copy of order dated 18.07.2025 is attached herewith). It is further pertinent to mention over here that the present execution application is pending for 15.09.2025 for arguments on the application for review of order dated 29.04.2024 as well as for filing reply to the application for issuance of warrants of attachment of property and for filing reply to issuance of arrest warrants of JD. Hence, the report is submitted accordingly.” Thanking you, (Poonam Kashyap), Civil Judge Jr. Division, SAS Nagar Mohali. 3. A perusal of the aforesaid would show that necessary steps are being taken to consider and decide the execution application filed by the petitioner and in view of the aforesaid report submitted by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), SAS Nagar, Mohali, no further directions are required to be issued in this regard. 4. Consequently, the present petition is disposed of. (JASGURPREET SINGH PURI) 09.09.2025 JUDGE Chetan Thakur Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No CHETAN THAKUR 2025.09.09 17:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.