Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8712 (JHR)

ARUN MONDAL ALIAS ARUN KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./984/2025 · 2025-05-09

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:14008 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 984 of 2025 1. Arun Mondal @ Arun Kumar Mondal, aged about 46 years, son of late Mahesh Mondal 2. Anil Mondal @ Arun Kumar, aged about 42 years, son of late Mahesh Mondal 3. Mukesh Mondal @ Mukesh Kumar Mondal, aged about 36 years, son of late Mahesh Mondal All are resident of village Nowadih, P.O. and P.S. Bishnugarh, District- Hazaribagh, Jharkhand 4. Kokil Mondal, aged about 64 years, son of Hem Lal Mondal, resident of Mohalla/village -Ulibag, P.O. and P.S. Saria, District-Giridih, Jharkhand …… Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Bindiya Devi wife of Ram Prasad Mondal, resident of Mohalla-Bhuli, “D” Block, Quarter No. 31, Sector 9(A), P.O. and P.S. Bank More, Bhuli, District- Dhanbad …… Opp. Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners : Mr. Krishna Nand Sahay, Advocate For the State : Mr. V.S. Sahay, A.P.P. 04/Dated: 09/05/2025 This petition has been filed for restoration of Cr.M.P. No. 404 of 2012 in its original file which was dismissed on 14.12.2023. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the name of learned counsel Mr. Sunil Kumar was reflecting but at that time he had left for his heavenly abode however he has filed vakalatnama along with Mr. Sunil Kumar though his name was not reflecting due to which the case was not marked. 3. Learned counsel for the State has got no serious objection if the said petition is restored in its original file. 4. It appears that sufficient cause has been made for restoration. 5. Accordingly, Cr.M.P. No. 404 of 2012 is restored in its original file. ( 2025:JHHC:14008 ) 6. Cr.M.P. No. 984 of 2025 stands allowed and disposed of. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Satyarthi/