Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8712 (ALL)

AMITABH SINGH v. CHAUDHARY MAHADEV PRASAD DEGREE THROUG ITS PRINCIPAL AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/3806/2023 · 2025-03-20

Saral Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:41780 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3806 of 2023 Petitioner :- Amitabh Singh Respondent :- Chaudhary Mahadev Prasad Degree Throug Its Principal And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jahnavi Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Kshitij Shailendra (Elevated),Kunal Ravi Singh,Satyavrat Sahai,Sunil Dutt Kautilya Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for respondents. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the fee of the petitioner for the Session 2022-23 is not being refunded by respondent- authority. In this respect, petitioner has submitted several representations to the respondent-authority, but respondent- authority has not paid any heed to the request of the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents states that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to respondent no.1 to consider the grievance of the petitioner. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without adverting into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation alongwith certified copy of this order raising all his grievances before the respondent no.1-Principal, Chaudhary Mahadev Prasad Degree College within a period of one month from today. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent no.1 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of one month thereafter from the date he receives representation of the petitioner. Order Date :- 21.3.2025 Mohit Digitally signed by :- MOHIT KUMAR KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad