110 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-3845-2025 Date of decision: 04.08.2025 SHAMA DEVI ..Petitioner Versus ANURAG AGGARWAL AND OTHERS ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Sandeep Tanwar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Nain, AAG, Haryana. SUDEEPTI SHARMA , J. (Oral) 1. The contempt petition has been filed for deliberate and intentional disobedience of order dated 11.02.2025, passed by this Court in CWP-8448-2021. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of State of Haryana contends that in compliance of order dated 11.02.2025, speaking order dated 24.06.2025 has been passed, which is attached with the present petition as Annexure R-6. This fact is not disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. The relevant portion of speaking order dated 24.06.2025, is reproduced as under:- “On the subject cited above, the order of Hon’ble Punjab and Haryana High Court complianced and it is decided that Smt. Shama Devi does not fulfill all the eligibility condition as prescribed in HCS (Pension) Rules, 2016. Hence, her claim of grant of family pension is not sustainable and is hereby, rejected. The detailed report is included in speaking order, which is attached hereby.” MOHD AYUB 2025.08.06 12:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-3845-2025 -2- 4. A perusal of speaking order dated 24.06.2025, shows that order dated 11.02.2025, passed in CWP-8448-2021, has been complied with. 5. In view of the above, the civil original contempt petition is dismissed. The contempt is purged and rule is discharged. August 04th, 2025 (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) Ayub JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No MOHD AYUB 2025.08.06 12:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.