NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED v. SMT. CHAND RANI CHAWLA
AO/539/2013 · 2025-05-22
Rajesh Tandon
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 871 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 871 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL DAILY LOK ADALAT
Appeal from Order No. 539 of 2013
National Insurance Company Ltd.
….....Appellant
Versus
Smt. Chand Rani Chawla and others
….….Respondents
Present: Mr. Lalit Belwal, Advocate for the appellant/ National Insurance Company. Mr. Abhishek Verma, Advocate for the respondent no.1 and 2. Daily Lok Adalat Award
Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J. (Retd.) Mahesh Chandra Pant, Adv./Member. By the present appeal the National Insurance Company Ltd. has challenged the award dated 25.10.2013, passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/3rd ADJ, Udham Singh Nagar. According to the claimant, vehicle No. UK-06M-2004 was being driven by the driver rashly and negligently with the result that the husband of the claimant no.1 sustained the injuries and expired. The Claims Tribunal while deciding the issue no.1, 2 and 3 have come to the conclusion that accident occurred due to the rash and negligent driving by the rider of the motor cycle No. UK-06M-2004. The Claims Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs. 20,42,416 (Twenty Lakh Forty-Two Thousand and Four Hundred Sixteen). 2. The Insurance Company has challenged the award on the ground that the multiplier of 11 has been wrongly used according to the age of the deceased as he was over 65 years. The Insurance Company is of the opinion that only the multiplier of 9 instead of 11 will be applicable and therefore the parties have agreed for the settlement and Smt. Chand Rani Chawla has sent a letter addressed to the Daily Lok
2 Adalat verified by Shri Abhishek Verma, Advocate and has also been verified by Shri Lalit Belwal, Advocate for the insurance company. The contents of the letter are quoted below:
“ सेवा मŐ श्रीमान लोक अदालत अिधकारी महोदय डेली लोक अदालत उȅराखंड उDŽ Ɋायालय नैनीताल िवषय – ए. ओ. संƥा 539/2013 का राजीनामे के आधार पर िनˑारण चाहने बावत। महोदय, िनवेदन है िक ए. ओ. संƥा 539/2013 नेशनल इंʴोरेɌ कɼनी िल.
बनाम श्रीमती चांद रानी चावला आिद वाˑे राजीनामा हेतु िनयत है िजसमŐ प्रािथŊनी चांद रानी चावला ƗितपूितŊ की धनरािश के आकलन के िलए अपने पित की औसतन वािषŊक आय 2,75,783 / ŝपये - मŐ 1/3 भाग की कटौती के पʮात् शेष वािषŊक आय 1,83,856/- ŝपये पर अपर िजला जज तृतीय िजला उधम िसंह नगर के Ȫारा लगाये गये गुणांक "11" के स्थान पर गुणांक "9" से प्रितकर की धनरािश मय 7 प्रितशत वािषŊक साधारण ɯाज से प्राɑ करने के िलए सहमत है। अतः श्रीमान जी से प्राथŊना है िक उपरोƅ वाद संƥा 539/2013 को राजीनामे के आधार पर िनˑाįरत करने िक कृपा करे। िदनांक 16/ April /2025 हˑाƗर (चांद रानी) प्रािथŊनी श्रीमती चांद रानी चावला हˑाƗर हˑाƗर (लिलत बेलवाल) (एडवोकेट अिभषेक वमाŊ) काउंसल इंʴोरŐस कंपनी (एडवोकेट रे˙ोंडŐट न. 1 एंड 2)”
3. In view of the above, both the parties have agreed that instead of the amount of Rs. 20,42,416 the amount comes to Rs. 16, 74,704/- along with the 7 % simple interest. 4. On 18.12.2013 by means of interim order the insurance company was directed to deposit Rs. 20,00,000/- the order is quoted below:-
3
“Mr. V.K.Kohli, Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr.Kanti
Ram Sharma, Advocate, present for the appellant. Heard. Admit the Appeal. Summon the record of the Tribunal. Issue notice to the respondents, returnable within a period of four
weeks. List thereafter. Also heard on Stay Application No. 13911 of 2013. If the appellant deposits Rs. 20,00,000/- (minus statutory deposit) with
the MACT concerned within a period of eight weeks, the execution of the
impugned award shall remain stayed, subject to the condition that the same has
not been recovered (Stay Application is disposed of accordingly). 5. The matter has been settled on the ground that the parties have agreed for reducing the multiplier of 9 instead of 11. Both Shri Lalit Belwal and Smt. Chand Rani Chawla have cooperated in the matter of settlement which was verified by Shri Abhishek Verma and both the advocates deserve appreciation for getting the matter resolved.
The accident occurred on 28.10.2009 and the appeal is of 2013 and the matter is now being settled. The credit goes to both the advocates for resolving the dispute amicably so that the widow Smt. Chand Rani Chawla may get the amount at least by the multiplier of 9 with 7 % interest. 6. The award is passed accordingly to the following directions: -
(1) The award passed by the Tribunal is modified to the extent
that instead of multiplier of 11, multiplier of 9 shall be
applied. (2) The interest shall continue to be 7 % per annum. (3) Shri Lalit Belwal has prayed that for any excess amount
deposited by the National Insurance Company, the
National Insurance Company will be entitled for its
reimbursement. He has also stated that he has deposited Rs. 20,00,000/- (Twenty Lakhs) in pursuance of the order
passed by this Hon’ble Court. The same shall be adjusted
4
accordingly. The compromise deed shall be part of this
award. (Mahesh Chandra Pant, Adv./Member) (Rajesh Tandon, J (Retd.)
22.05.2025 22.05.2025
Nahid