Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8709 (UTT)

SHAKUL UNIYAL v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/726/2024 · 2025-04-03

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.766 of 2024 With WPCRL No.726 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. V.B.S. Negi, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Ms. Prabha Naithani, learned counsel for the petitioner(s) is present. 2. Mr. G.C. Joshi, learned AGA for the State is present. 3. Mr. Lalit Sharma and Mr. Navnish Negi, learned counsel for respondent no.3. 4. Learned State Counsel made a statement at bar that in both the writ petitions, charge-sheet has been filed against the petitioner(s) on 19.03.2025. 5. To this, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner(s) submits that he would challenge the charge- sheet in appropriate proceedings before the appropriate Forum. 6. In view of the statement made by learned State Counsel, both the writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 03.04.2025 AK