JABBAR @ GABBAR @ GUDDU v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/30388/2025 · 2025-08-19
Saurabh Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 87077 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 87077 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:143281 Court No. - 77 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 30388 of 2025 Applicant :- Jabbar @ Gabbar @ Guddu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Bhagwan Das Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. The present application under Section 528 BNSS, has been filed for quashing NBW order dated 18.03.2009 passed in Special Session Trial no. 131/2008, (State vs. Kubda @ Tahri and others) arising out of Case Crime no. 264A of 2007 under sections 395, 436, 332, 353, 427, 336, 323, 147 IPC and 3/5 State Asset Damage Prevention Act, PS- Nai Ki Mandi, District Agra pending in court of learned Additional Session Judge, Court no. 12, Agra.
3. Learned counsel for applicant submits that impugned order is against the facts and law. The applicant had no knowledge about the proceedings initiated against him due to which he could not appear on the date fixed by the trial Court, hence, non-bailable warrant was issued against the applicant.
4. Per contra, learned A.G.A opposed the prayer.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the matter, applicant is directed to appear before the learned court concerned in pursuance to impugned NBW order dated 18.03.2009 within three weeks from today. Till three weeks from today, no coercive action shall be initiated against the applicant. After the expiry of aforesaid period of three weeks, learned concerned court is directed to proceed as per law.
6. With the aforesaid observation, the application is disposed of. Order Date :- 20.8.2025 Shaswat Digitally signed by :- SHASWAT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad