Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010047582025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. I.A.(Civil)/986/2025 ON THE DEATH OF APPELLANT RAMA RANJAN CHANDA HIS LEGAL HEIRS SMTI RITA RANI CHANDA W/O KOUSHIK CHANDA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE/ TOWN CHANDPUR PS CHURAIBARI SUB DIVISION DHARMANAGAR DIST NORTH TRIPURA 799262 2: SRI SUBODH CHANDA S/O LATE RAMA RANJAN CHANDA RESIDENT OF DHALCHARA PART I PS BORKHOLA SUB DIVISION SILCHAR DIST CACHAR ASSAM 3: SMTI SUMITA CHANDA D/O LATE RAMA RANJAN CHANDA RESIDENT OF DHALCHARA PART I PS BORKHOLA SUB DIVISION SILCHAR DIST CACHAR ASSAM 4: SRI SUJIT CHANDA S/O LATE RAMA RANJAN CHANDA RESIDENT OF DHALCHARA PART I PS BORKHOLA SUB DIVISION SILCHAR Page No.# 2/4 DIST CACHAR ASSAM 5: SMTI NAMITA SARKAR D/O LATE RAMA RANJAN CHANDA RESIDENT OF DHALCHARA PART I PS BORKHOLA SUB DIVISION SILCHAR DIST CACHAR ASSAM VERSUS SRI SUDIP DEY S/O LATE RAMESH CHANDRA DEY RESIDENT OF DUBA BEEL P.O- ALIPORE T.E P.O.AND PS-LAKHIPUR DISTRICT- CACHAR 2:SRI DILIP DEY S/O LATE RAMESH CHANDRA DEY RESIDENT OF DUBA BEEL P.O- ALIPORE T.E P.O.AND PS-LAKHIPUR DISTRICT- CACHAR 3:SRI AJIT DEY RESIDENT OF DUBA BEEL P.O- ALIPORE T.E P.O.AND PS-LAKHIPUR DISTRICT- CACHAR 4:SMTI SANTILOTA DATTA W/O LATE HARMOHAN DATTA RESIDENT OF DHALCHERRA GRANT (NILCHARA) PO JAROILTOLA PH. PS BORKHOLA DIST CACHAR ASSAM 5:SHRI SITANGSHU DATTA S/O LATE HARMOHAN DATTA RESIDENT OF DHALCHERRA GRANT (NILCHARA) PO JAROILTOLA PH. PS BORKHOLA DIST CACHAR Page No.# 3/4 ASSAM 6:SRI HARAN DATTA S/O LATE HARMOHAN DATTA RESIDENT OF DHALCHERRA GRANT (NILCHARA) PO JAROILTOLA PH. PS BORKHOLA DIST CACHAR ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MS. A DAS Advocate for : MR G N SAHEWALLA appearing for SRI SUDIP DEY In RSA Case No. 255/2010 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER 21.04.2025 1. Heard Ms. A. Das, the learned counsel for the applicants. Also heard Ms. S. Todi, the learned counsel for the respondent. 2. This application under Order XXII Rule 3(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been preferred by the applicants for setting aside abatement of the connected regular second appeal No. 255/2010 on the death of the sole appellant. 3. It is pertinent to mention herein that in an interlocutory application, namely, (I.A. (Civil) No. 985/2025), the delay in preferring the present application has already been condoned. 4. The learned counsel for the respondent has not objected to the prayer for setting aside abatement in the instant case. Page No.# 4/4 5. After considering the submissions of the counsels, as well as the grounds stated in the present petition, the abatement of the connected regular second appeal No. 255/2010, on the death of the sole appellant is hereby set aside and this interlocutory application is accordingly allowed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant