Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8702 (RAJ)

MUBIN S/O KURSID v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/2838/2025 · 2025-03-05

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:9867] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2834/2025 Sakim S/o Moideen @ Isa, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Dharamshala, Police Station Kethwada, District Deeg. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2838/2025 1.Mubin S/o Kursid, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Piruka, Police Station Gopalgarh, District Deeg. (At Present Petitioner Lodge In Sub Jail Deeg) 2. Sohil S/o Usman, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Kuliyana, Police Station Kathwada, District Deeg. (At Present Petitioner Lodged In Sub Jail Deeg) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Khan Mr. Anoop Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 05/03/2025 These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No. 24/2025 registered at Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg for the offence(s) under Sections 303(2), 317(2), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), of BNS and Section 66-D of IT Act. [2025:RJ-JP:9867] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2834/2025] Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the accused- petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. The offences alleged to have been committed by the petitioners are triable by Magistrate. The accused petitioners are in custody since long and the trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioners. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes these bail applications. Heard and perused the material available on the record. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties and looking to the fact that offences alleged to have been committed by petitioners are triable by Magistrate. The accused petitioners are in custody since long and the trial of the case will take considerable time, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. Accordingly, these bail application under Section 483 BNSS are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners 1. Sakim S/o Moideen @ Isa, 2. Mubin S/o Kursid, 3. Sohil S/o Usman, in connection with FIR No. 24/2025 registered at Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg shall be enlarged on bail provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J ashu/82-83