Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8702 (GAU)

MUNMI BARUA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM and 5 ORS.

WP(C)/6656/2017 · 2025-08-12

Kaushik Goswami

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010047182017 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6656/2017 MUNMI BARUA PRESENTLY WIFE OF SRI POLJIT SAIKIA, C/O SRI HEMA KANTA BARUAH , RESIDENT OF H/NO. 8, MILAN NAGAR, L LANE, DIBRUGARH, UNDER P.O. CR BUILDING, P.S. DIBRUGARH IN THE DIST. OF DIBRUGARH, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM and 5 ORS. REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, IN THE PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT, DISPUR GUWAHATI-6. 2:THE ASSAM PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISION JAWAHAR NAGAR GUWAHATI -22 IN THE DIST. OF KAMRUP ASSAM REP. BY THE CHAIRMAN/SECRETARY OF THE APSC. 3:THE CHAIRMAN ASSAM PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION JAWAHAR NAGAR GUWAHATI -22 INTHE DIST. KAMRUP ASSAM 4:THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS ASSAM PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION JAWAHR NAGAR GUWAHATI -22 Page No.# 2/3 IN THE DIST. OF KAMRUP ASSAM 5:SMTI. KAVERI HAZARIKA D/O NOT. KNOWN PRESENTLY WORKING AS INSPECTOR OF TAXES C/O THE SUPERINTENDENT OF TAXES TINSUKIA UNDER P.O. and P.S. TINSUKIA IN THE DIST. OF TINSUKIA ASSAM 6:MS. RIMJHIM GOGOI D/O NOT. KNOWN PRESENLTY WORKING AS LABOUR INSPECTOR C/O THE DEPTY COMMISSIONER GOLAGHAT UNDER P.O. and P.S. GOLAGHAT IN THE DIST.OF GOLAGHAT ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.S AHMED, MS.S KAUSHIK,MR. G CHOUDHURY,MR.K K GOSWAMI Advocate for the Respondent : MR.C BARUAH, MR.B CHAKRABORTY(R-5),SC, APSC,MR.S HUSSAIN(R-5),SC, PERSONNEL DEPT.,MS.P SARMAH(R-5),MS.P HAZARIKA(R-5) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI ORDER Date : 13.08.2025 Heard Ms. N. Kalita, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D. Borah, learned Government Advocate appearing for the state respondent. Ms. N. Kalita, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has instructed not to press the instant writ petition and accordingly, seeks withdrawal of the same. Page No.# 3/3 In view of the aforesaid endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed on being withdrawal. JUDGE Comparing Assistant