Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:142647 Court No. - 89 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 30446 of 2025 Applicant :- Rakesh Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Abhijeet Kumar Pandey,Anand Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J. 1. Heard Shri Anand Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Radhey Shyam, learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated by the concerned police in 4 cases. It has further been submitted that in all the cases bail application has been allowed by this Court/ court below but due to his poverty and financial crisis he is not able to manage separate sureties in all the cases. It has further been submitted that the applicant may be allowed to be released on bail only on two sureties in regard to all the cases. 3. Learned counsel further submitted that the applicant has been enlarged on bail in the following cases: 1. Case Crime No. 516 of 2014 Under sections 147, 148, 149, 34, 120-B, 302, 307 of I.P.C., Police Station Khorabar, District Gorakhpur. 2. Case Crime No. 109 of 2014, Under sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 284, 120-B of I.P.C., Police Station Uruwa Bazar, District Gorakhpur. 3. Case Crime No. 619 of 2016, Under sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 504, 506, 332, 353, 307, 342, 427, 336, 436, 325 of IPC and Section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act and under Section 3 of Prevention of Damages of Public Property Act, Police Station Shahpur, District Gorakhpur. 4. Case Crime No. 308 of 2015, Under sections 307, 394 of IPC, Police Station Gulariha, District Gorakhpur. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed and submitted that all the offences against the applicant are pending in different courts and hence prayer of the applicant cannot be allowed. 5. Keeping in view the submission made by the learned counsel for the applicant as well as the factual argument and the judgment and order dated 29.10.2018 of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh passed in Petition (s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 8914-8915/2018, this Court is of the view that ends of justice would be met in case applicant is directed to submit fresh two sureties and a personal bond to the satisfaction of the Court concerned in one case and the same shall be considered by the Court concerned as sureties and bonds in other case(s) for the purpose of releasing the applicant on bail. 6. It is ordered accordingly. 7. With the aforesaid observations, the instant application U/s 528 BNSS is accordingly disposed of. Order Date :- 20.8.2025 RKM Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad