HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 8519 of 2024 Court No. - 83 HON'BLE SHEKHAR KUMAR YADAV, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record. 2. This application has been filed by applicants with a prayer to set aside the impugned order dated 20.06.2024 passed by Sessions Judge (SC/ST Act), Mathura in S.S.T. No. 508 of 2022 (State Vs. Mool Chand), under sections 323, 354, 504, 506 IPC and section 3(1)Da, Dha of SC/ST Act, P.S. Kosi Kalan, District Mathura whereby the discharge application 13 Ka of the appellants has been dismissed. 3. Submission of learned counsel for the applicants is that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the present case just to pressurize and harass the applicants, in fact, no such incident has taken place. Further submission is that no offence against the applicants is disclosed and the court below has utterly failed to consider as no prima facie case is made out against the applicants. He also pointed out certain documents in support of his contention. 4. I have gone through the impugned order. Impugned order itself reflects that charges against the accused have already been framed and the grounds taken for discharge cannot be considered at this stage as truthfulness, sufficiency and acceptability of the evidence produced by the accused can be adjudged during trial. The impugned order passed by the court below is well in conformity in law and does not suffer from error of illegality, irregularity and warrant any interference by this Court. 5. The prayer for quashing the impugned order is hereby refused. 6. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. September 23, 2025 RPD Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Rajesh Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.) Rohit And Another .....Appellant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RATAN PRAKASH DWIVEDI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad