- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53635 CMP No. 560 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ CIVIL MISC. PETITION NO. 560 OF 2024 BETWEEN: GLYNK INC THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR AND AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE MR. NIRANJAN SUKOMARAN R/AT C40 RADIANCE BLOSSOM BUDIGERE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 049 KARNATAKA, INDIA. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ABHISHEK D H.,ADVOCATE) AND: THE MONK TECH LABS PVT. LTD., THROUGH MR. AJAY KUMAR CEO AND CO FOUNDER 160, ROBINSON ROAD SINGAPORE-068914. EMAIL CHETAN@THEHOUSEMONK.COM ALSO AT 2ND FLOOR, NO. 379, 100 FEET ROAD, HAL 2ND STAGE INDIRA NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 038 EMAIL AJ@MONKTECHLABS.COM MOB 91 7760192779. …RESPONDENT THIS CIVIL MISC. PETITION UNDER SEC.11(6) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 PRAYING TO AS PER CLAUSE PAGE NO.39 ORDER FORM OF SERVICE CLAUSE 13 AGREEMENT DATED: 04.04.2022 AT ANNEXURE C, IN PAGE NO.39 ALLOW THE PRESENT PETITION AND PASS APPROPRIATE ORDERS Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53635 CMP No. 560 of 2024 FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF ADVOCATE S.N. PRASHANTH CHANDRA, HAVING AN OFFICE AT 1432/2, SNR ARCADE, 1ST FLOOR, TOLL GATE, KRISHNADEVARAYA RD, VIJAYANAGAR, BENGALURU OR ANY OTHER COMPETENT PERSON, AS THE AS THE SOLE ARBITRATOR TO RESOLVE THE DISPUTE BETWEEN THE PARTIES. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: a. As per clause page No.39 ORDER FORM OF SERVICE Clause 13 agreement dated: 04.04.2022 at Annexure C, in page no.39 allow the present petition and pass appropriate orders for the appointment of Advocate S.N. Prashanth Chandra, having an office at 1432/2, SNR Arcade, 1st Floor, Toll Gate, Krishnadevaraya Rd, Vijayanagar, Bengaluru or any other competent person, as the as the sole arbitrator to resolve the dispute between the parties. b. Any other order or relief which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper be pleased to pass in favour of the petitioner and against the respondent in the interest and furtherance of justice 2. None appears for the petitioner. 3. Despite the order dated 28.11.2025, the process fee has been paid nor is there any appearance on the part of the petitioner. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53635 CMP No. 560 of 2024 4. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE SR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 141