Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8699 (JK)

MARYAM UN NISA AND ORS. v. TASADUK HUSSAIN

CCP(S)/323/2024 · 2025-07-01

Sanjay Dhar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Serial No. 41 Regular Cause List. HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CCP(S) 323/2024 in[WP(C) 2132/2023]. MARYAM UN NISA AND ORS. …Petitioner (s) Through: Mr. Pervaiz Wani, Advocate. VERSUS TASADUK HUSSAIN. Through: Mr. Alla ud din Ganai, AAG with Ms. Shaila Shameem, Assisting Counsel. …Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE. ORDER 01.07.2025 Through the medium of the present contempt petition, the petitioners are seeking implementation of Order dated 11th of December, 2023 passed by the Writ Court whereby the respondent No.2 was directed to consider the plea raised by the petitioners and pass appropriate orders thereon Statement of facts/Compliance Report stands filed on behalf of the respondents. As per the said Compliance Report, the claim of the petitioners was considered in light of the judgement passed by the Writ Court and the same was found to be devoid of any merit. In this regard, respondents have issued Consideration Order No. 34/DSEK of 2023, dated 27.12.2023. In view of the fact that the respondent has considered the claim of the petitioners and found it to be devoid of any merit, the order of the Writ Court stands complied with. Therefore, the respondent cannot be proceeded against. Accordingly, the contempt proceedings are closed and the contempt petition is disposed of, leaving it open to the petitioners to challenge the consideration order passed by the respondent by way of an appropriate proceedings. Disposed of. (Sanjay Dhar) Judge SRINAGAR 01.07.2025 Showkat Khan