CRM-M-41753-2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 105 CRM-M-41753-2025 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: 04.08.2025 RIMPY KUMAR ALIAS RIMPI KUMAR ... ...PETITIONER Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ... RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. I.S. Khaira, Advocate with Mr. Gurmej Singh, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. TPS Walia, AAG, Punjab. *** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) 1. Prayer This petition has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 for grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No. 51 dated 20.05.2025 registered under Sections 115(2), 333, 126(2), 3 (5) of BNS, 2023 at P.S. Laudhowal/Ladhowal, District Ludhiana. 2. Contentions On behalf of the petitioner Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. As per the allegations, the petitioner along with co-accused persons abused the attacked the complainant’s son and his friend Narender Singh. He has argued that though the petitioner was armed with iron rod but no injury has been attributed upon him, moreover, the petitioner suffered injuries as well. He further submits that co-accused of the present petitioner Anuradha 2025.08.04 06:14 I agree to specified portions of this document CRM-M-41753-2025 2 namely Narinder Singh @ Narinder Kumar vide order dated 21.07.2025 passed in CRM-M-36526-2025 and Parveen Kumar vide order dated 07.07.2025 passed in CRM-M-34646-2025 have been granted the concession of anticipatory Bail by this Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes on behalf of the petitioner that he is ready and willing to join the investigation and cooperate with the investigating officer. Notice of motion. On behalf of the State Learned State Counsel appearing on advance notice on instructions from Investigating officer vehemently opposes the prayer for grant of concession of anticipatory bail stating that the petitioner along with co-accused persons while armed with iron rods and cudgets attacked and caused multiple injuries to the complainant’s son and one Narinder Singh who is the friend of son of the complainant. 3. Analysis Be that as it may, after giving a thoughtful consideration to the submissions as made, by the counsel for both the parties to the effect that no injury has been attributed to the petitioner, he himself suffered injuries and, two other co-accused persons have been granted concession of anticipatory bail by this Court, hence, this Court finds no reason to deny the petitioner the concession of anticipatory bail, wherein the petitioner has bona fide intentions and is willing to join the investigation and cooperate for furtherance of the same so that the final report can be submitted by the Investigating Agency within the stipulated time period. Anuradha 2025.08.04 06:14 I agree to specified portions of this document CRM-M-41753-2025 3 4. Relief Hence, in view of the admitted set of circumstances before this Court, the petitioner is hereby directed to be released on anticipatory bail subject to him joining investigation and reporting to the Investigating Officer concerned within a period of one week from today, on furnishing of personal/surety bonds to the satisfaction of Arresting/Investigating Officer. The petitioner shall also abide by the terms and conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) of BNSS of which are reproduced below :- ‘When the High Court or the Court of Session makes a direction under sub-section (1), it may include such conditions in such directions in the light of the facts of the particular case, as it may think fit, including- (i) a condition that the person shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) a condition that the person shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; (iii) a condition that the person shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court; (iv) such other condition as may be imposed under sub-section (3) of section 480, as if the bail were granted under that section.’ Anuradha 2025.08.04 06:14 I agree to specified portions of this document CRM-M-41753-2025 4 However, it is made clear that in case the petitioner does not comply with the aforesaid direction of joining the investigation within one week, the order passed by this Court today shall automatically stand cancelled. The petition in the aforesaid terms stand allowed. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) JUDGE 04.08.2025 anuradha Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Anuradha 2025.08.04 06:14 I agree to specified portions of this document