Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8698 (DEL)

SHRI RISHI ANAND v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR.

W.P.(C)/1628/2024 · 2025-02-28

Tejas Karia, Vibhu Bakhru

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1628/2024 SHRI RISHI ANAND .....Petitioner Through: Mr M M Kashyap and Ms Poonam Seth, Advocates. versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Shilpa Ohri, ASC for MCD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA O R D E R % 25.04.2025 CM APPL. 24484/2025(condonation of delay) 1. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 10 days in filing the accompanying Review Pet No.226/2025 stands condoned. 2. The application stands disposed of. CM APPL. 24483/2025(Exemption) 3. Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 4. The application stands disposed of. REVIEW PET. 226/2025 and CM APPL. 24482/2025(Stay) 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the applicant/Review Petitioner, we find no grounds to review the order dated 28.02.2025. 6. It is also material to note that the order dated 28.02.2025 was passed directing the Municipal Corporation of Delhi [MCD] to shift the review petitioner/petitioner to the alternative site as referred to by the MCD in its status report, on the express consent of the petitioner as recorded in paragraph no.13 of the order dated 28.02.2025. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/04/2025 at 16:07:07 7. In view of the above, the review petition stands dismissed. The pending application is also disposed of. 8. It has come to our notice that a typographical error has crept in the paragraph no.14 of the order dated 28.02.2025 in as much as it refers to the ‘allocated site’ instead of ‘alternative site’. Accordingly, paragraph no.14 of the order dated 28.02.2025 is rectified to read as under: - “14. In view of the above, the relief as sought for by the petitioner cannot be granted. However, we bind down the MCD to its statement made on its behalf that it would make available the alternative site to the petitioner.” VIBHU BAKHRU, J TEJAS KARIA, J APRIL 25, 2025 M Click here to check corrigendum, if any This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/04/2025 at 16:07:07