Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8698 (AP)

NEELISETTI SUBBA RAO v. NEELISETTI PURNA CHANDRA RAO

CRP/637/2020 · 2025-06-30

T C D Sekhar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010094292020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI d TUESDAY THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 637 OF 2020 Petition under Section 115 of Code of Civil Procedure, Civil petition aggrieved by the Order dt. 05.09.2019 passed in I.A No. 72 of 2019 in lA No. 55 of 2014 in O.S No. 281 of 2007 on the file of the court of Learned Addl. Senior Civil Judge (FTC), Gudivada. revision Between: 1. Neelisetti Subba Rao, S/o. Late Kotaiah, aged 60 years, Occ- Business R/o. Pamarru Village and Mandal, Krishna District. 2. Neelisetti Srinivas, S/o. Subba Rao, aged 32 years, Occ- Business, R/o. Pamarru Village and Mandal, Krishna District. ...Petitioners AND 1. Neelisetti Puma Chandra RAO, S/o. Late Kotaiah, aged 46 employee, R/o. Door No. 48-147, Opp- Maseed Street, Near IDPL Petrol Bunk, Ramireddy Nagar, Hyderabad. 2. NVSRK Prasad, S/o. Late Kotaiah, aged 59 years, Occ- Business, Lavanya Cloth Stores, Sivalayam Street, Pamarru Village and Mandal, Krishna District. years. 3. Neelisetti Satyanarayana, S/o. Late Kotaiah, aged 58 years, Kirana Merchant, R/o. Sivalayam Street, Pamarru Village and Mandal, Krishna District. 4. P Sowbhagyalakshmi, W/o. Narayana Rao, aged 62 years. Household C/o. Sri Balaji Coffee Stores, Opp- Bus Stand, Hanuman Junction Krishna District. 5. P Adilakshmi, W/o. Narayana Rao, aged 55 years. Housewife, Lavanya Cloth Stores, Sivalayam Street, Pamarru Village and Mandal, Krishna District. 6. Somisetti Ananthalakshmi, W/o. Ranga Prasad, aged 47 years. Properties, Sudha Sweets, Near Chinnagopuram, Palakollu Village and Mandal, West Godavari District. (Respondents 2 to 6 are not necessary Parties to this CRP) ...Respondents/Plaintiffs/Defendants 2 to 6 lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 73 days in filing the CRP as against an Order dt. 05.09.2019 passed in I.A No. 72 of 2019 in lA No. 55 of 2014 in O.S No. 281 of 2007 on the file of the court of Learned Addl. Senior Civil Judge [FTC], Gudivada and to receive the CRP Counsel for the Petitioners: M/S NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondents: The Court made the following order: APHC010094292020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] TUESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 637/2020 Between: 1.NEELISETTI SUBBA RAO, S/0. LATE KOTAIAH, AGED 60 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS MANUAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2.NEELISETTI SRINIVAS, S/0. SUBBA RAO, AGED 32 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, R/0. PAMARRU VILLAGE AND MANUAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. R/0. PAMARRU VILLAGE AND ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1.NEELISETTI PURNA CHANDRA RAO, S/0. LATE KOTAIAH, AGED 46 YEARS, EMPLOYEE, R/0. DOOR NO. 48-147, OPP- MASEED STREET, NEAR IDPL PETROL BUNK, RAMIREDDY NAGAR, HYDERABAD. 2.NVSRK PRASAD, S/0. LATE KOTAIAH, AGED 59 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, LAVANYA CLOTH STORES, SIVALAYAM STREET, PAMARRU VILLAGE AND MANUAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3.NEELISETTI SATYANARAYANA, , S/0. LATE KOTAIAH, AGED 58 YEARS, KIRANA MERCHANT, R/0. SIVALAYAM STREET, PAMARRU VILLAGE AND MANUAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4.P SOWBHAGYALAKSHMI, W/0. NARAYANA RAO, AGED 62 YEARS, HOUSEHOLD, C/0. SRI BALAJI COFFEE STORES, OPP- BUS STAND, HANUMAN JUNCTION, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5.P ADILAKSHMI, W/0. NARAYANA RAO, AGED 55 YEARS, HOUSEWIFE, LAVANYA CLOTH STORES, SIVALAYAM STREET, PAMARRU VILLAGE AND MANUAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 6.SOMISETTI ANANTHALAKSHMI, W/0. RANGA PRASAD, AGED 47 YEARS, PROPERTIES, SUDHA SWEETS, NEAR CHINNAGOPURAM, PALAKOLLU VILLAGE AND MANUAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to aggrieved by the Order dt. 05.09.2019 passed in I.A No. 72 of 2019 in lA No. 55 of 2014 in O.S No. 281 of 2007 on the file of the court of Learned Addl. Senior Civil Judge (FTC), Gudivada, the above named petitioners prefer this memorandum of Civil Revision Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.- The Court made the following order: J THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 637 nf 7non ORDER: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the cause in the revision petition does not infructuous. The said submission is placed on record. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any shall stand closed. survive and it has become as Sd/- G HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Addl. CHyil'Judge (Senior Division) [FTC], Gudivada Krishna District. 2. One CC to M/s Nimmagadda Revathi, Advocate [OPUC] 3. The Section Officer, V.R Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. 4. Two CD Copies MKP vna HIGH COURT DATED:01/07/2025 ORDER CRP NO. 637 OF 2020 DISMISSING THE CIVIL REVISION PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS