Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 86979 (PNJ)

RINKU RANA v. RAKESH KUMAR

COCP/3873/2025 · 2025-09-23

Alka Sarin

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

218 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-3873-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision : 23.09.2025 Rinku Rana ... Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kumar ... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN Present : Mr. D.R. Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate for the respondent. ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral) 1. This is a petition under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for initiation of proceedings against the respondent for non- compliance of the order dated 13.01.2021 passed in CR-2031-2020. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent has filed the compliance report by way of an affidavit dated 18.09.2025 of Rakesh Kumar, Executive Engineer, HPGCL, Panipat wherein it has been stated that as per the order dated 13.01.2021, the entire dues from the date of the actual reinstatement till the date he continues performing duties of the post, have since been released. Learned counsel has further pointed out that the award of the Tribunal has also been challenged. The compliance report is taken on record. Registry is directed to scan the same and tag at appropriate place. 3. In view thereof, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and the same is disposed off as such. Rule stands discharged. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off. 4. Needless to say, the petitioner would always be at liberty to get the present petition revived in case anything survives. 23.09.2025 Ankur ( ALKA SARIN ) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO ANKUR GOYAL 2025.09.24 08:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment