CRA-S-3365-20 IN THE H (205 +101) KASHMIRI LA STATE OF PUN CORAM: HON Present: Mr. Ms. Mr. for t MANISHA BAT CRM-30543-202 Applicatio exceptions and annexed with the annexures. CRA-S-3365-20 1. The order dated 04. Fazilka in case a Sections 115(2), 2025 (O&M) (1) HE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AN CHANDIGARH C Dat RI LAL Versus F PUNJAB AND ANR HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANI Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate for the Ms. Sakshi Bakshi, AAG, Punjab Mr. Ajay Kamboj, Advocate for the applicant-respondent No.2 **** BATRA, J. (ORAL) 2026 lication for placing on record is al and the reply filed by the resp ith the application is ordered to be 2025 The instant appeal has been filed b d 04.10.2025 passed by the Learn case arising out of FIR No.65 dated 2 15(2), 117(2), 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya AB AND HARYANA AT CRA-S-3365-2025 (O&M) Date of decision : 18.08.2026 ... Appellant ...Respondents MANISHA BATRA for the appellant is allowed subject to all just respondent No.2/complainant o be placed on record alongwith iled by the appellant against the Learned Judge, Special Court, ated 24.05.2025 registered under Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for AMIT SHARMA 2026.08.19 15:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRA-S-3365-20 short “BNS”) Tribes (Preventio Police Station K filed by the appel 2. Vide appellant was investigation. 3. Lear has joined the in of the appellant counsel for respo by the responde serious and he do that his anteceden therefore, urged t 4. This for the parties. 5. In investigation and is not required. observed that a c the appellant. Ac 2025 (O&M) (2) and Section 3(1)(s) of Schedul evention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (f tion Khuian Sarver, District Fazilka, appellant for grant of anticipatory bai Vide order dated 31.10.2025 pa was released on interim bail an Learned State counsel on instructio the investigation on 06.01.2026 and ellant is not required. It is, howev r respondent No.2 that since grievous pondent No.2, hence, the allegations he does not deserve to be given benef tecedents are not clean and he is involv urged that the appeal does not deserve This Court has heard the submission view of the fact that the appella on and given the nature of allegations uired. As such, without commenting hat a case for grant of anticipatory ba . Accordingly, the appeal is allowed cheduled Castes and Scheduled 989 (for short “SC/ST Act”) at azilka, whereby the application ory bail had been rejected. passed by this Court, the il and was directed to join tructions states that the appellant 6 and the custodial interrogation however, submitted by learned ievous injury has been sustained ations against the appellant are benefit of bail. It is also argued involved in 02 more cases. It is, serve to be allowed. issions made by learned counsel appellant has already joined the ations, his pre-trial incarceration enting on merits of case, it is ory bail is made out in favour of lowed and the order 31.10.2025 AMIT SHARMA 2026.08.19 15:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRA-S-3365-20 granting interim compliance of c impugned order d 6. Sinc application, if an 18.08.2026 Amit Sharma 2025 (O&M) (3) nterim bail to the appellant is m e of conditions laid down in Section order dated 04.10.2025 is set aside. Since the main appeal has bee , if any, is rendered infructuous. (MA Whether speaking/reasoned:- Ye is made absolute, subject to ection 482(2) of BNSS and the s been disposed of, pending (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No AMIT SHARMA 2026.08.19 15:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.