Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:12502 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Contempt Case (Civil) No. 216 of 2023 Dr. Shambhu Nath Keshri, aged about 69 years, son of late Vishnupad Saw, Resident of Prasad Apartment, Behind Apsara Hotel, Opposite Kiran's Girls Lodge, Lohra Kocha, Lalpur, P.O & P.S Lalpur, District- Ranchi
2. Dr. Bhup Narayan Thakur, aged about 72 years Resident of Amrawati Colony near Shiv Mnadir, Chutia, P.O & P.S Chutia, District- Ranchi
3. Subhash Chandra Singh, aged about 69 years, Son of late Kashi Nath Singh, Resident of At+ P.O Punadih P.S Diharganj Via Begampur, Dist- Patna (Bihar)
... … Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. State Of Jharkhand
2. Dr. Ajit Kumar Sinha, Vice Chancellor, Ranchi University having office at Main Road Near Shahid Chowk, P.O, G.P.O, & P.S Kotwali, District- Ranchi.
3. Dr. M.C Mehta, Registrar, Ranchi University, having office in Main Road Near Shahid Chowk, P.O, G.P.O, P.S, Kotwali, District- Ranchi.
4. Mr. C.R.S. Lugun, Managing Committee, Gossner College, Ranchi, through Secretary, having office at Club Road, PO & PS-Chutia, Dist- Ranchi
5. Prof. Elani Purty, Principal, Gossner College, Ranchi, having office at Club Road, PO & PS-Chutia, Dist-Ranchi … … Opposite Party(s)
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioners : Mr. Aayush Avant Srivastava, Advocate
Mr. Pratyush Shounikya, Advocate
Mr. Shubham Mayank, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Yasir Arafat, AC to GP-IV For the Ranchi University : Mr. Anoop Kumar Mehta, Advocate
Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate
--------
Order No.18 /Dated: 25th April 2025
Pursuant to the order dated 07.03.2025 opposite party no.5-Gossner college has filed an affidavit in this case.
2.
Learned counsel appearing for the college fairly submits that some amount has already been paid to the petitioner and some amount might be left out. This statement of the college has not been controverted by the petitioner and learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the
2025:JHHC:12502 2
instant contempt case may be disposed of by directing the college to verify the documents and if any amount still remains to be paid, the same shall be paid to the petitioner.
3. Having regard to the aforesaid submission, the instant contempt case stands disposed of by directing the college to verify the account of this petitioner and if at all any amount still remains to be paid, the same shall be paid as early as possible.
(Deepak Roshan, J.) Amit