HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. SURAJ PAL CHAUHAN & OTHERS
LPA/86/2018 · 2025-03-19
Meenakshi I Mehta, Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 86969 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 86969 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
208
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
LPA No.86 of 2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: 19.03.2025
Haryana Urban Development Authority …..Appellant. Versus Suraj Pal Chauhan and others .....Respondents.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA ***** Present:- Mr. Jayant Puneet Bamal, Advocate for
Mr. H.S. Gill, Advocate and
Mr. R.S. Longia, Advocate
for the appellant.
Dr. Surya Parkash, Advocate
for respondents No.1 to 4.
(through Video-Conferencing)
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral)
Admittedly, respondents No.1 to 4-writ petitioners have attained superannuation. The impugned order dated 07.09.2017 passed by the learned Single Judge in CWP No.21558 of 2013 titled as ‘Suraj Pal Chauhan and others Vs. Haryana Urban Development Authority and another’ has already been implemented in their cases. No interim relief was granted to the appellant while issuing notice of motion in this appeal on 07.02.2018. The issue has, thus, become academic. We, therefore, YAG DUTT 2025.03.21 16:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment
LPA No.86 of 2018 (O&M) -2-
refrain from passing any order and the present appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.
2.
Pending civil misc. applications also stand disposed of.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA)
JUDGE
(MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) March 19, 2025
JUDGE Yag Dutt
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether Reportable: Yes/No YAG DUTT 2025.03.21 16:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment