PRAKASH v. SRI SUDHIR KUMAR. THE COMMISSIONER, KANPUR NAGAR NIGAM
CAPL/4272/2025 · 2025-09-23
Neeraj Tiwari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 86962 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 86962 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4272 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for applicant and Sri Abhinava Krishna Srivastava, learned counsel for opposite party.
2. Pursuant to the previous orders of this Court, learned counsel for opposite party has filed affidavit of compliance, which is taken on record. Based upon affidavit, he submitted that order of Writ Court has been complied with, therefore, this application may be dismissed as infructuous, which is not objected by counsel for applicant.
3. Under such facts of the case no further order is required to be passed.
4. File is consigned to the record. September 24, 2025 Sartaj Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ravi Sahu Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Abhinava Krishna Srivastava (Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Prakash .....Applicant(s) Sri Sudhir Kumar. The Commissioner, Kanpur Nagar Nigam .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SARTAJ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad