HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 6723 of 2025 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed by counsel for the applicant is taken on record. 2. Heard counsel for the applicant, Sri Nagendra Mishra, learned AGA for the State and perused the material on record. 3. This application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 96 of 2019, under Sections 307, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station - Muradnagar, District- Ghaziabad, during the pendency of trial. 4. Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. As per the first information report, the role of firing has been assigned to the applicant and co-accused Khalid alias Badshah. In the alleged incident, no person has received any injury. No medical report is available in the case diary. During the pendency of investigation, the applicant was granted protection till submission of police report by this Court vide order dated 25.02.2019 passed in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No.5053 of 2019 (Mohd. Khalid Qureshi @ Badshah and another Vs. State of U.P. and 2 others). The applicant had cooperated in the investigation. Investigation has been completed. Charge-sheet has been filed. The applicant has been summoned by the concerned Court. No custodial interrogation is required. The applicant came to know about the pending proceeding only in the month of May, 2025. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. The applicant has apprehension of his arrest in the above mentioned case. In case, the applicant is granted anticipatory bail, he will not Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Santosh Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Saklain .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) misuse the said liberty. 5. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. 6. Having regard to the submissions made, considering the nature of accusations, antecedents of the applicant, and the fact that in the alleged incident, no person has received any injury; no medical report is available in the case diary; during the pendency of investigation, the applicant was granted protection till submission of police report; investigation has been completed; charge sheet has been filed; the applicant had cooperated in the investigation; the applicant has been summoned by the concerned court, no custodial interrogation is required; without commenting on merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled for anticipatory bail. 7. In the event of arrest, the applicant Saklain, involved in the aforesaid case crime be released on anticipatory bail during pendency of trial, on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall make himself available on each date fixed in the matter by the court concerned; (ii) the applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to the Court; (iii) the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if he has passport the same shall be deposited by him before the concerned court. 8. In default of any of the conditions, the court concerned is at liberty to pass appropriate orders for enforcing and compelling the same. 9. The application stands disposed of. September 18, 2025 Manish Kr NABAIL No. 6723 of 2025 2 (Vivek Varma,J.) Digitally signed by :- MANISH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad