RAHUL v. PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS
CWP/21168/2023 · 2025-05-28
Harsimran Singh Sethi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 86953 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 86953 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 219 CWP-21168-2023 (O&M) Decided on :28.05.2025 RAHUL . .Petitioner Versus PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS
. . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI PRESENT: None for the petitioner. Mr. Rajeev Anand, Advocate for the respondents. **** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (Oral)
1. Perusal of the file reveals that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on the last date of hearing.
2. Today again, no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
3. It can be safely presumed that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the present remedy.
4. Dismissed for non-prosecution.
5. Pending civil miscellaneous application, if any, stands disposed of..
(HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE 28.05.2025 Riya Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No RIYA 2025.05.28 17:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document