JITENDER AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CWP/22382/2025 · 2025-08-04
Vinod S Bhardwaj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 86949 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 86949 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-22382-2025 (O&M).
-1-
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH. 124
CWP-22382-2025 (O&M).
Date of Decision: 04.08.2025.
JITENDER AND ANOTHER
... Petitioner(s)
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ... Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ. Present: Mr. Sunil Agnihotri, Advocate,
for the petitioners.
Dr. (Ms.) Malvika Singh, DAG, Haryana.
VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL)
Challenge made in the present writ petition is to the order dated 06.06.2024 (Annexure P-7) rejecting the claim of the petitioners for appointment as Dispenser ( Ayurvedic) notionally from the date candidates lower in merit to the petitioners have been appointed. 2
Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that the controversy in the present writ petition is covered by the ratio of the judgment passed by this Court in the matter of Bal Krishan and others Vs. State of Haryana and another, CWP No.18680-2024, decided on 16.07.2025.
RAJ KUMAR ARORA 2025.08.05 17:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-22382-2025 (O&M).
-2-
Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) contends that the petitioner(s) would be satisfied, at this juncture, in case respondent-State is directed to consider and decide the claim of the petitioners as espoused in the present writ petition by passing a reasoned and speaking order in a time bound manner. 3
Notice of motion. 4
Dr. (Ms.) Malvika Singh, DAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and she has no objection to the above request. 5
Accordingly, with the consent of the parties and without commenting upon the merits of the case, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2-Director General of Ayush Haryana, Panchkula, to decide the claim espoused by the petitioner(s) in the present writ petition by treating the same as a representation and to pass a speaking and reasoned order thereupon in accordance with law in terms of the facts pleaded herein as well as the aforesaid judgment passed by this Court within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order and a copy of present petition along with accompanying Annexures.
August 04, 2025.
(VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) raj arora
JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable
: Yes/No RAJ KUMAR ARORA 2025.08.05 17:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document