IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ABA No. 2067 of 2025 1. Md.Sajjad @ Sajjad Ansari Aged about-46 Years, Son of-Md. Aziz, Resident of-Village-Bhandaro, P.O.-Barhi, P.S.-Barhi, District-Hazaribag. 2. Aziz Mian, Aged about-66 Years, Son of-Late Deoki Miyan, Resident of-Village-Bhandaro, P.O.-Barhi, P.S.-Barhi, District- Hazaribag. 3. Md. Salauddin, Aged about-22 Years, Son of-Md. Asik, Resident of-Village-Bhandaro, P.O.-Barhi, P.S.-Barhi, District-Hazaribagh. … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … opp. party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioners : Mr. D.K. Prasad , Adv. For the State : Mr. Praful Jojo , Addl.. PP 02 / 28.03.2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Barhi P.S. Case No. 501 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147/148/323/ 324/379/384/354/504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners were installing bamboo on the land of the informant and when the informant along with family members, went to the said land, the petitioners abused him in filthy language and outraged the modesty, demanded extortion of Rs. 50,000/- and snatched away silver and gold jwelleries. It is then submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all false and those allegations are general and omnibus in nature. It is next submitted that the petitioners are ready to co-operate with the investigation of the case and also undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security and they undertake not to go over the land of the complainant bearing Khata no. 10, plot no. 485, new plot no. 2009 of area of 1.25 Decimals, out of total area of 15 Decimals, as described in para 2 of the complaint and also undertakes, not to annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during pendency of the case hence, the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. The learned Addl. PP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Hence, in the event of arrest by the police or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, the petitioners shall be released on bail on depositing Rs. 10,000/- each as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Hazaribag in connection with Barhi P.S. Case No. 501 of 2023 subject to the condition that the petitioners will not go over the land of the complainant bearing Khata no. 10, plot no. 485, new plot no. 2009 of area of 1.25 Decimals, out of total area of 15 Decimals, as described in para 2 of the complaint nor will annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during pendency of the case and will co-operate with the Investigation of the case and will appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will submit mobile phone number and photocopy of Aadhaar card at the time of surrender in the court below with an undertaking not to change mobile phone number during the pendency of the case along with the other conditions laid down under section 482 (2) of BNSS, 2023. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Smita/-