JAGDISH CHANDER ARORA AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CWP/22336/2025 · 2025-08-04
Vinod S Bhardwaj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 86913 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 86913 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-22336-2025 (O&M).
-1-
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH. 121
CWP-22336-2025 (O&M).
Date of Decision: 04.08.2025.
JAGDISH CHANDER ARORA AND OTHERS
... Petitioner(s)
Versus
THE STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ... Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ. Present: Mr. Sandeep Thakan, Advocate,
for the petitioners.
Dr. (Ms.) Malvika Singh, DAG, Haryana.
VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL)
Prayer made in the present writ petition is for directing the respondents to re-fix the pension of the petitioners by granting annual increment as they retired after completing more than six months service from the date of last increment. 2
Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that the controversy in the present writ petition is covered by the ratio of the judgment passed by a Division Bench of this Court in the matter of Mahabir Singh Tanwar Vs. State of Haryana and others, CWP No.14627-2024, decided on RAJ KUMAR ARORA 2025.08.06 10:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-22336-2025 (O&M).
-2-
24.04.2025 along with other connected matters as well as by this Court in the matter of Shamsher Singh and others Vs. State of Haryana and others, CWP No.15582-2025, decided on 29.05.2025 along with other connected matters. Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) contends that the petitioner(s) would be satisfied, at this juncture, in case competent authority of the respondent-State is directed to consider and decide the claim of the petitioners as espoused in the present writ petition as well as in the light of the aforesaid judgments by passing a reasoned and speaking order in a time bound manner. 3
Notice of motion. 4
Dr. (Ms.) Malvika Singh, DAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and she has no objection to the above request. 5
Accordingly, with the consent of the parties and without commenting upon the merits of the case, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents, to decide the claim espoused by the petitioner(s) in the present writ petition by treating the same as a representation and to pass a speaking and reasoned order thereupon in accordance with law in terms of the facts pleaded herein as well as the aforesaid judgments passed by this Court within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order and a copy of present petition along with accompanying Annexures.
RAJ KUMAR ARORA 2025.08.06 10:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-22336-2025 (O&M).
-3-
6
Needless to mention that if upon considering the case of the petitioners, in case any monetary benefit is found due and payable to the petitioner(s), the same shall be disbursed in favour of the petitioner(s) within a further period of two months.
August 04, 2025.
(VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) raj arora
JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable
: Yes/No RAJ KUMAR ARORA 2025.08.06 10:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document