Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8691 (RAJ)

VIPIN S/O BHANU PRATAP v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/2841/2025 · 2025-04-24

Ashutosh Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:17284] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2841/2025 1. Vipin S/o Bhanu Pratap, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Suhag Nagar, Sector -2, House No. 2/845, Police Station Kotwali South, District Firozabad (U.P.) 2. Rahul S/o Srimanpal, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Near Shyamveer Dharmshala, Nangla Vishnu Nai Aabadi, Police Station Linepar, District Firozabad (U.p.) 3. Karan S/o Nirmal, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Near Shyamveer Dharmshala, Nangla Vishnu Nai Aabadi, Police Station Linepar, District Firozabad (U.p.) (At Present Accused-Applicants are confined in Sub Jail Neem Ka Thana). ----Accused/Applicants Versus State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Applicants : Mr. Vidhut Kumar Gupta, Adv. For Respondent : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Addl.G.A. with Ms. Arti Sharma, Dy.G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 24/04/2025 1. The present bail application has been filed by the accused- applicants under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S, 2023 against the order dated 11.02.2025 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Srimadhopur, Sessions Division Sikar in Bail Application No.25/2025 arising out of FIR No.23/2025, registered at Police Station Srimadhopur, District Neem ka Thana for the offence punishable under Section 305 (b) of B.N.S., 2023 (later on for the [2025:RJ-JP:17284] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2841/2025] offences punishable under Sections 331(4) and 305(a) of B.N.S., 2023) by which the bail application of the accused-applicants under Section 483 of B.N.S.S., 2023 has been dismissed. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicants submits that the accused-applicants have falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel also submits that the charges levelled against the accused-applicants are triable by Magistrate. Learned counsel further submits that in this matter, charge-sheet has been filed. 3. Learned counsel for the accused-applicants argues that the accused-applicants are of about 22 to 25 years of age. Learned counsel also argues that the accused-applicants were arrested on 24.01.2025 and since then, they are behind the bars and trial will take long time to conclude, therefore, the accused-applicants be granted benefit of bail. 4. Learned Deputy Government Advocate along with learned Additional Government Advocate vehemently oppose this bail application. 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and also perused the material available on record. 6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, and considering the age of the accused-applicants; the fact that the applicants are behind the bars since 24.01.2025; charges levelled against the accused-applicants are triable by Magistrate and also considering the fact that the trial will take long time to conclude, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court deems it proper to allow the bail application filed by the applicants. [2025:RJ-JP:17284] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2841/2025] 9. Consequently, this bail application filed under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S, 2023 is allowed. It is ordered that accused-applicants namely (1) Vipin S/o Bhanu Pratap, (2) Rahul S/o Srimanpal and (3) Karan S/o Nirmal, arrested in connection with FIR No.23/2025, registered at Police Station Srimadhopur, District Neem ka Thana will be released on bail; provided each of them furnishes personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- each and two solvent attested sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court. Applicants will be required to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J AARZOO ARORA /105