IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 2576/2024 Decided on: 27.06.2025 Veena Devi …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Anr. .…Respondents. ………………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Shiv Pal Manhas, Advocate. For the respondents: Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J Following order was passed in the matter on 12.03.2025: - “Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have retrospectively regularized the services of the petitioner from the date of her initial appointment. A corrigendum in this regard has been issued on 13.02.2025 (Annexure R-3). Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that surviving grievances of the petitioner are in respect of release of monetary benefits to her in terms of her retrospective regularization under corrigendum dated 13.02.2025. Let learned Deputy Advocate General to have further instructions in the matter. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 List after two weeks.” 2. Pursuant to above, learned Deputy Advocate General has placed on record office instructions dated 25.03.2025, which read as under: - “………..In this regard, it is submitted that as per the compliance received from the respective DDO of the Petitioner i.e. Block Medical Officer Ghumarwin, further forwarded by the Chief Medical Officer Bilaspur vide letter dated 21.03.2025, the payment of arrears amounting to Rs.13,45,673/- stood claimed vide Bill No. 100843 dated 12.03.2025 in respect of Petitioner on account of having been allowed the regularization from the date of her initial appointment on contract basis and after making statutory deduction, net amount of Rs. 10,42,418/- stood released to the Petitioner. The copy of letters of CMO Bilaspur dated 21.03.2025 and letter of BMO Ghumarwin dated 17.03.2025 are enclosed as Flag-A and B………….” 3. In view of above, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the grievance of the petitioner has now been redressed. Accordingly, this writ petition to stand disposed of. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 27th June, 2025(rohit)