CRA-S-3478-20 IN THE H (206) RAJ KUMAR STATE OF PUN CORAM: HON Present: Mr. Ms. Mr. MANISHA BAT 1. Thro against the order Court, Fazilka in under Sections 1 short “BNS”) Tribes (Preventio Police Station K filed by the appel 2. Vide appellant was investigation. 2025 (O&M) (1) HE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AN CHANDIGARH CR Dat AR Versus F PUNJAB AND ANR HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANI Mr. Ashok Kumar Sama, Advocate Ms. Sakshi Bakshi, AAG, Punjab Mr. Rhythm Bajaj, Advocate for the **** BATRA, J. (ORAL) Through the instant appeal has be order dated 14.10.2025 passed by th ilka in case arising out of FIR No.65 d ions 115(2), 117(2), 3(5) of Bharatiya and Section 3(1)(s) of Schedul evention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (f tion Khuian Sarver, District Fazilka, appellant for grant of anticipatory bai Vide order dated 11.11.2025 pa was released on interim bail an AB AND HARYANA AT CRA-S-3478-2025 (O&M) Date of decision : 18.08.2026 ... Appellant ...Respondents MANISHA BATRA vocate for the appellant for the respondent No.2 has been filed by the appellant d by the Learned Judge, Special o.65 dated 24.05.2025 registered aratiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for cheduled Castes and Scheduled 989 (for short “SC/ST Act”) at azilka, whereby the application ory bail had been rejected. passed by this Court, the il and was directed to join AMIT SHARMA 2026.08.19 10:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRA-S-3478-20 3. Lear has joined the in of the appellant counsel for respo serious in nature. be allowed. 4. This for the parties. 5. In investigation and is not required. observed that a c the appellant. Ac granting interim compliance of c impugned order d 6. Sinc application, if an 18.08.2026 Amit Sharma 2025 (O&M) (1) Learned State counsel on instructio the investigation on 06.01.2026 and ellant is not required. It is, howev r respondent No.2 that the allegations nature. It is, therefore, argued that the This Court has heard the submission view of the fact that the appella on and given the nature of allegations uired. As such, without commenting hat a case for grant of anticipatory ba . Accordingly, the appeal is allowed nterim bail to the appellant is m e of conditions laid down in Section order dated 14.10.2025 is set aside. Since the main appeal has bee , if any, is rendered infructuous. (MA Whether speaking/reasoned:- Ye tructions states that the appellant 6 and the custodial interrogation however, submitted by learned gations against the appellant are at the appeal does not deserve to issions made by learned counsel appellant has already joined the ations, his pre-trial incarceration enting on merits of case, it is ory bail is made out in favour of llowed and the order 11.11.2025 is made absolute, subject to ection 482(2) of BNSS and the s been disposed of, pending (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No AMIT SHARMA 2026.08.19 10:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.