SURAJ PARKASH v. JAMMU MUNICIPAL CORPORATION TH ITS COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS
WP(C)/2226/2025 · 2026-05-19
Moksha Khajuria Kazmi
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 869 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 869 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 56
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 2226/2025 CM No. 5108/2025
Suraj Parkash ….Petitioner(s) Through:- None. V/s
Jammu Municipal Corporation and ors. …..Respondent(s) Through:- Mr. Mayank Gupta, Advocate.
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE
ORDER
19.05.2026
1.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that in the present petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged Show Cause Notice dated 22.07.2025 issued by respondent No. 3. It is further submitted that pursuant to the said Show Cause Notice, the construction raised by the petitioner has already been demolished, as such, the petitioner has also challenged the demolition notice by filing a separate writ petition bearing WP(C) No. 2406/2025.
2. On the last date of hearing, petitioner remained unrepresented. Today also, same is the position, which clearly shows that the petitioner is no longer interested in prosecuting the present petition. Accordingly, the same is dismissed for non-prosecution, along with all connected application.
(MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI)
JUDGE JAMMU 19.05.2026 Ram Krishan