IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 130 Darshan Singh State of Punjab CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. service of the petitioner, in pursuance of the policy dated 16.05.2023, to pay him minimum pay scale plus dearness allowance and grade pay alongwith arrears, representation dated 16.05.2025, Annexure P the same has yet not evoked any response. He, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner 2. made. 3. merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the representation IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Darshan Singh Versus f Punjab and Others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Himmat Singh Sidhu, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, Punjab. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Prayer made is for directing the respondents to regularize the service of the petitioner, in pursuance of the policy dated 16.05.2023, to pay him minimum pay scale plus dearness allowance and grade pay alongwith arrears, regarding which learned cou representation dated 16.05.2025, Annexure P has yet not evoked any response. He, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner Learned State counsel has no objection to the In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the representation IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-22299-2025 (O & M) Date of decision: 04.08.2025 ....Petitioner ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Advocate, Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, Punjab. directing the respondents to regularize the service of the petitioner, in pursuance of the policy dated 16.05.2023, and to pay him minimum pay scale plus dearness allowance and grade pay regarding which learned counsel submits that a representation dated 16.05.2025, Annexure P-6, has been submitted, but has yet not evoked any response. He, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same in a time earned State counsel has no objection to the limited prayer In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the representation dated 16.05.2025, within a PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.08.04 17:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CWP-22299-2025 -2- period of 6 months, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to him and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to his interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioner shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. 04.08.2025 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.08.04 17:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.