HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 6826 of 2025 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Sri V.P. Tripathi, learned AGA for the State- opposite party, and perused the material available on record. 2. This application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 18 of 2025, under Sections 333, 115(2), 118(1), 352, 351(3), 109(1) B.N.S., Police Station Rajpura, District Sambhal. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. As per the first information report, the applicant along with three named accused is alleged to have assaulted the informant and his wife. As per the medical report of the informant, he received three injuries. The said injuries were simple in nature. The other injured Jaimanti received two injuries. The said injuries were also simple in nature. It is contended that the nature of the injuries shows that there was no intent to murder. Vague and general allegations have been levelled against the applicant. The investigation has been completed. The applicant had cooperated in the investigation. Charge-sheet has been submitted. No custodial interrogation is required. The applicant has been summoned by the court concerned. The criminal history of the applicant has been explained in para 4 of second supplementary affidavit. The applicant has apprehension of his arrest in the above mentioned case. 4. Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ardhendu Shekhar Sharma, Ram Babu Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Madan Alias Madan Pal Singh .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 5. Having regard to the submissions made, considering the nature of accusations and antecedents of the applicant and, in particular, the fact that as per the medical reports, the injuries received by the two injured were simple in nature; the nature of the injuries shows that there was no intent to murder; vague and general allegations have been levelled against the applicant; the investigation has been completed; the applicant had cooperated in the investigation; and, no custodial interrogation is required, without commenting on merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on anticipatory bail. 6. 6. In the event of arrest, the applicant- Madan @ Madan Pal Singh, involved in the aforesaid case crime, be released on anticipatory bail during pendency of trial, on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall make himself available on each and every date fixed in the matter by the court concerned; (ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to the Court; (iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if he has passport, the same shall be deposited by him before the concerned court. 7. Further, in default of any of the conditions, the court concerned is at liberty to pass appropriate orders for enforcing and compelling the same. 8. The application stands disposed of. September 19, 2025 S.S. NABAIL No. 6826 of 2025 2 (Vivek Varma,J.) Digitally signed by :- SIDDHARTH SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad