APHC010094092020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 5639/2020 Between: 1. GANGISETTI THULASAMMA, W/O. VENKATASWAMY, HINDU, AGE 54 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. VEMPALLE VILLAGE AND POST, MADANAPALLE MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, II TOWN POLICE STATION, MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. CHAKALA LAKSHMI DEVI, W/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED 48 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.4-4-3-4, MARUPURI STREET, MADANAPALLE TOWN AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a issue an appropriate writ, or order or direction, more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 4 in not registering the complaint made by the petitioner dated 20.01.2020 against the 5th respondent is illegal, arbitrary and violation of Principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 4 to 2 register the complaint against the respondent No.5 as per the contents of the complaint dated 20.01.2020 made by the petitioner.” 2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the disputes between the parties are purely civil in nature. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Petitioner is at liberty to work out her remedies before appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:11.09.2025 ASR 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.5639 of 2020 Dt.11.09.2025 Asr