Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 86864 (KAR)

SRI M NAGAPPA v. SRI Y S ESHWARA SETTY

CRP/249/2019 · 2025-10-31

V Srishananda

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43916 CRP No. 249 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.249 OF 2019 BETWEEN: 1. SRI M NAGAPPA S/O KOLIMUDDAIAH AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 2. SMT THIMMAKKA W/O LATE CHIKKANNA AGED 75 YEARS 3. SRI NAGAPPA S/O LATE CHIKKANNA AGED 55 YEARS 4. SRI CHIKKA S/O NAGAPPA AGED 35 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF OBALAPURA VILLAGE Y N HOSAKOTE HOBLI, PAVAGADA TALUK TUMKURU DISTRICT – 561202 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI M B CHANDRACHOODA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI Y S ESHWARA SETTY S/O LATE Y SATHYANARAYANA SETTY AGED 70 YEARS Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43916 CRP No. 249 of 2019 2. SMT Y E NIRMALAMMA W/O Y S ESHWARA SETTY AGED 65 YEARS BOTH ARE RESIDENTS OF OBALAPURA VILLAGE Y N HOSAKOTE HOBLI, PAVAGADA TALUK TUMKURU DISTRICT – 561 202 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI HARISH.H.V, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2) THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 14.02.2019 PASSED ON IA No.2 IN O.S.No. 53/2014 ON THE COURT OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, PAVAGADA REJECTING THE IA No.II FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11[d] R/W ORDER 2 RULE 2 R/W SECTION 9 OF CPC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Matter was passed over to the afternoon session at the request of Sri Mohith, advocate for Sri M.B.Chandrachooda, learned counsel for the revision petitioners who sought that the matter be taken up in the afternoon session. 2. Accordingly, matter was called out in the afternoon session. 3. None appears for the revision petitioners. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43916 CRP No. 249 of 2019 4. Matter was adjourned from 28.10.2025 to today with an understanding that the matter would be proceeded today by making alternative arrangement. 5. Since there is no representation on behalf of the revision petitioners, petition is dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE kcm List No.: 1 Sl No.: 48