Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 86850 (KAR)

SRI. A.N. NAGARAJA, v. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY,

WP/26095/2025 · 2025-11-17

B M Shyam Prasad, T M Nadaf

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47192-DB WP No. 26095 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF WRIT PETITION NO. 26095 OF 2025 (S-KSAT) BETWEEN: SRI. A.N. NAGARAJA, S/O. A.M. NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, ACCOUNTS SUPERINTENDENT, O/O THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PANCHAYAT RAJ ENGINEERING DIVISION, BENGALURU URBAN, BANASHANKARI, S. KARIYAPPA ROAD, BENGALURU 560 070. AND ALSO AT NO.30, 7TH CROSS, 1ST MAIN, MARUTHINAGARA, YELAHANKA, BENGALURU 560 064. NOW ORDERED TO BE REPORTED IN THE GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF RDPR. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAMESH K R.,ADVOCATE) Digitally Signed by REKHA R Location : High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47192-DB WP No. 26095 of 2025 AND: 1. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDINGS, BENGALURU 560 001. 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, PANCHAYAT RAJ ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, GRAMINABHIVRUDDI BHAVANA, ANAND RAO CIRCLE, BENGALURU 560 001. 3. THE PRINCIPAL DIRECTOR, KARNATAKA STATE AUDIT AND ACCOUNTS DEPARTMENT, TTMC BUILDING, 3RD FLOOR, 'A' BLOCK, BMTC, SHANTHINAGARA, BENGALURU 560 027. 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PANCHAYAT RAJ, ENGINEERING DIVISION, BENGALURU URBAN, BANASHANKARI, S. KARIYAPPA ROAD, BENGALURU 560 070. 5. SRI. PRASHANTH K.M. FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED MAJOR, ACCOUNTS ASSISTANT, O/O. THE PRINCIPAL DIRECTOR, KARNATAKA STATE AUDIT AND ACCOUNTS DEPARTMENT, TTMC BUILDING, 3RD FLOOR, 'A' BLOCK, BMTC, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47192-DB WP No. 26095 of 2025 SHANTHINAGARA, BENGALURU 560 027. NOW REPORTED AS ACCOUNTS SUPERINTENDENT, O/O THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PANCHAYAT RAJ ENGINEERING DIVISION, BENGALURU URBAN, BANASHANKARI, S. KARIYAPPA ROAD, BENGALURU 560 070. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.VIKAS ROJIPURA., AGA FOR R1 TO R4; SRI. V.R. SARATHY., ADVOCATE FOR R5) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUITON OF INDIA PRAYING TO a) ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER OR DIRECTION, QUASHING THE IMPUGNED COMMON ORDER 07/08/2025 PASSED BY THE KARNATAKA STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL AT BENGALURU IN APPLICATION NO.1304/2025 C/W APPLICATION NO.2691/2025 AT ANNEXURE-A AND THE ORDER DATED 09/04/2025 BEARING NO.RALEPA 5 SIAABA 2024-25/89 PASSED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT AT ANNEXURE-E AND THE ORDER DATED 17/06/2025, BEARING NO.GRA AA PA 116 SSK 2025 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT AT ANNEXURE-H. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47192-DB WP No. 26095 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD) The petitioner is unsuccessful in his application in No.1304/2025 with the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal, Bengaluru [for short, 'the Tribunal'] and as such he has preferred this petition. On 17.10.2025, it was stated on behalf of the State Government that the petitioner will be posted to a vacant post in Tumakuru Divisional Office, and though there is some delay, it is presently stated that the Official Memorandum dated 11.11.2025 is issued posting the petitioner to the Chikkaballapura Division. If Sri Vikas Rojipura, the learned Additional Government Advocate, seeks disposal in the light of the turn of events, Sri K.R. Ramesh, the learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that Smt. A. - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47192-DB WP No. 26095 of 2025 Nalina Kumari, whom the petitioner must replace in terms of the Notification dated 07.11.2025, has called such notification in question with the Tribunal but there is no interim order and the petitioner has reported to duty. The learned counsel submits that, in the peculiarities, this Court may observe that the petitioner will be at liberty to move this Court for revival in case there is any interim order that requires the petitioner to hand over the charge to Smt.A.Nalina Kumari. This Court accepts the submission, and the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE SA ct:sr