KESHARMAL @ KISHNA S/O RIDDARAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/2848/2025 · 2025-05-05
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8685 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8685 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:18870] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2848/2025 Kesharmal @ Kishna S/o Riddaram, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Junaba Ki Dhani, Tan Gram Billu, Police Station Parvatsar, Tehsil Makrana, District Nagour, Rajasthan. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined District Jail Sikar) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vidhut Kumar Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 05/05/2025
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.18/2025 registered at Police Station-Reengus, District-Sikar for the offences under Sections 140(3), 310(2) and 311 of BNS, 2023.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel further submits that the petitioner was not present at the time of the committing alleged offence. The only allegation against him that he has given information to the other co-accused by performing the act of the racce. No recovery has been affected against him and there is no
[2025:RJ-JP:18870] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2848/2025] previous case against the petitioner. Petitioner is behind the bars since 22.01.2025. Charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Kesharmal @ Kishna S/o Riddaram shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/68