Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86773 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-283 Year-2023 Thana- CHAUSA District- Madhepura ====================================================== Shyam Sundar Yadav S/o Late Mangan Yadav Resident of village- Dhuriya Sautari, PS- Chausa, District- Madhepura ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Barun Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 2 28-01-2025 Heard Mr. Barun Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. 3. Petitioner along with other accused persons are said to have came at the place of occurrence armed with lathi and arms and started abusing and forbade the informant from ploughing the field. On objection, co-accused Ashok Yadav fired from his firearms which hit Sohni Kumari who died on the spot. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case due to land dispute. He submits that there is no specific allegation of firing against the petitioner and allegations are
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86773 of 2024(2) dt.28-01-2025 2/2 general and omnibus in nature. He submits that there is specific allegation of firing is against co-accused Ashok Yadav. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioner. He further submits that petitioner has criminal antecedent two criminal antecedents as stated in para-3 of the bail application and he is languishing in judicial custody since 25.09.2024. 5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Chausa P.S. Case No. 283 of 2023, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and if he fails to appear on two consecutive dates his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled.
devendra/- (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) U T