Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 86830 (KAR)

MALATHI B v. PANKAJ KUMAR PANDEY

CCC/1060/2024 · 2025-12-18

Anu Sivaraman, Vijaykumar A Patil

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54313-DB CCC No. 1060 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 1060 OF 2024 BETWEEN: MALATHI B. W/O. B. V. ARUNA KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, NO. 663, 10TH MAIN, RPC LAYOUT, HAMPINAGAR, VIJAYANAGAR, 2ND STAGE, BANGALORE-560 104. …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. ABHISHEK N V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. PANKAJ KUMAR PANDEY MANAGING DIRECTOR, KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LIMITED, KAVERI BHAVAN, K.G. ROAD, BANGALORE-560 009. 2. VIJAY. B. P. DIRECTOR (ADMIN AND HR), KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LIMITED, Digitally signed by CHANNEGOWDA PREMA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54313-DB CCC No. 1060 of 2024 KAVERI BHAVAN, K.G. ROAD, BANGALORE-560 009. 3. MAHANTESH BILAGI MANAGING DIRECTOR, BANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED, K.R. CIRCLE, BANGALORE-560 001. 4. B. R. DAYANAND GENERAL MANAGER (HR), BANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED, K.R. CIRCLE, BANGALORE-560 001. …ACCUSED (BY SRI. SHIRISH KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR A1 TO A2; SMT. SWAMINI G. MOHANAMBAL, ADV. FOR A3 & A4) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, PRAYING TO PUNISH ALL THE ACCUSED FOR COMMITTING CONTEMPT OF THE ORDER DATED 11.07.2024 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WP NO.15013/2024 (S-RES) PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54313-DB CCC No. 1060 of 2024 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) Learned counsel for respondents have filed a memo indicating that 100% of the pension amount is paid as ordered by the learned Single Judge. 2. Memo is taken on record. 3. The contempt proceeding are dropped, liberty is kept open to the complainant to workout her remedies insofar as interest for the delayed payment in accordance with law. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE RAK List No.: 3 Sl No.: 1