Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 86826 (KAR)

MR. SUJITH KUMAR C R v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/18174/2025 · 2025-12-17

Ashok S Kinagi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53912 WP No. 18174 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 18174 OF 2025 (S-RES) BETWEEN: MR. SUJITH KUMAR C R AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, SON OF LATE MR. RATNASWAMY RESIDING AT WARD NO. 15, NEW JANATHA COLONY, KASABA HOBLI, CHAMARAJANAGARA TALUK, CHAMARAJANAGARA TOWN, CHAMARAJANAGARA DISTRICT …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SRINIVAS V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53912 WP No. 18174 of 2025 VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CHAMARAJANAGAR, CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT - 571313 3. THE COMMISSIONER THE CHAMARAJANAGAR MUNICIPALITY CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT - 571313 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B. SUKANYA BALIGA, AGA FOR R1 & R2 SRI. P PRASAD, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NOS.2 AND 3 TO CONSIDER AND TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 07/01/2025, VIDE ANNEXURE-A, ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER WITHIN 2 MONTHS FROM THE RECEIPT OF THE ORDER. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ***** - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53912 WP No. 18174 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking a mandamus directing respondent Nos.2 and 3 to consider and take appropriate action on the representation dated 07.11.2024 submitted by the petitioner vide Annexure 'A'. 2. The petitioner has produced an endorsement dated 29.10.2024 vide Annexure 'N' issued by respondent No.3, wherein respondent No.3 has already considered the representation of the petitioner for his appointment on compassionate grounds. The petitioner has not challenged the said endorsement vide Annexure 'N'. Hence, the question of considering the representation dated 07.11.2024 would not arise. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53912 WP No. 18174 of 2025 4. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to challenge the endorsement dated 29.10.2024 vide Annexure 'N', if so desired. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE RK CT:KHV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4