Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 86825 (PNJ)

REENA v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/41874/2025 · 2025-09-24

Aaradhna Sawhney

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

220 CRM-M-41874-2025 Date of Decision: 24.09.2025 Reena ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE AARADHNA SAWHNEY Present: Mr. Raman Chawla, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Vikram Singh, AAG, Haryana. *** AARADHNA SAWHNEY , J. (ORAL) 1. By virtue of the present petition under Section 482 BNSS, petitioner, who is accused in case bearing FIR No.330 dated 30.06.2025 registered under Sections 21(b)/27A/61/85 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, at Police Station Hisar City Hisar, District Hisar, has prayed for grant of pre-arrest bail. 2. On 08.08.2025, following order was passed by this Court:- By virtue of the present petition, the petitioner is seeking relief of pre arrest bail in a case bearing FIR No.330 dated 30.06.2025 registered under Sections 21(b), 27A/61/85 of NDPS Act, 1985 at Police Station Hisar City Hisar, District Hisar. “Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner was nominated only on the basis of disclosure statement of co-accused namely Kapil, from whom 7.36 grams of Heroin (little more than small quantity) was recovered. There is no other material to connect present petitioner with the crime. It is further submitted that the petitioner is not involved in any other case and she is ready and willing to join the investigation. Learned State counsel has filed the status report dated 07.08.2025 in pursuance to the order dated 04.08.2025 of this Court. He opposed the bail. Heard. Status report perused. PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.09.25 18:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-41874-2025 -2- In view of the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the petitioner is hereby directed to join investigation within seven days from today and co-operate in the same. In the event of the arrest of the petitioner, she shall be released on interim bail on her furnishing personal/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer/Investigating Officer. She shall also abide by conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) BNSS. Adjourned to 18.09.2025.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitio/ner has submitted that in compliance to the order dated 08.08.2025 passed by this Court, the petitioner has already joined the investigation and as such interim bail granted to the petitioner may be confirmed. 5. Learned State counsel, on instructions of ASI, Vikram, has also intimated that the petitioner has joined investigation and is no more required for any custodial investigation in this case nor she is required for further investigation. 6. Heard. 7. Keeping in view the above submissions made by learned State counsel and the fact that the petitioner had joined the investigation, interim bail granted vide order dated 08.08.2025 is hereby confirmed, subject to conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) BNSS. Further the petitioner is directed to join investigation as and when required in future by way of written notice for such purpose to be served by Investigating Officer of this case upon the petitioner; she will not tamper with the evidence nor will influence the witnesses and will not leave the country without prior permission of the Court. 8. The petition stands allowed. (AARADHNA SAWHNEY) 24.09.2025 JUDGE Parveen kumar Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable :Yes/No PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.09.25 18:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document