USMAN ALI SEKH v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR
CRM (A)/398/2025 · 2025-02-07
Joymalya Bagchi, Subhendu Samanta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8681 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8681 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
07.02.2025 46 sdas Rejected
C.R.M. (A) No. 398 of 2025
In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita in connection with Karimpur Police Station Case No. 224 of 2024 dated 27.12.2024 under Sections 329(4)/109/76/117(2)/351(2)/3(5) of the BNS. And In Re : Usman Ali Sekh .….. petitioner
Mr. Asraf Mandal Mr. Tanbir Mandal ..…for the petitioner
Mr. Subhamoy Bhattacharya Ms. Sana Naaz ….. for the State
Ms. Shalini Bairagi ….. for de facto complainant
1.
Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits there is delay in lodging FIR. Petitioner has been falsely implicate due to domestic quarrel. He prays for anticipatory bail.
2.
Learned Counsel for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits petitioner is son-in-law of one of the victims. He and his family members had trespassed into her house and assaulted her brutally. As a result Kohinoor’s grand daughter also suffered injuries.
Kohinoor was hospitalized. This resulted delay in lodging FIR.
3. We have considered the materials on record. In view of the primary role played by the petitioner in brutally assaulting Kohinoor resulting in life threatening injuries as well
2 as endangering her grand daughter’s life we are not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to him.
4. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected.
(Subhendu Samanta, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)